Social media encompasses a wide range of communication and media outreach. It’s a place where people can post about their lives, react to others’ experiences, and sometimes even fabricate their reality. The platform enables both gossip and rumors, but it also offers positives. Behind a screen, you can express thoughts you might be too shy to voice in person, project confidence you may lack, or present an enhanced image of yourself.


One of social media’s greatest benefits is that it helps us maintain connections with loved ones who live far away. I have a sister in the Coast Guard who’s stationed overseas, and sometimes, our only way to communicate is when she can log into Instagram on one of the boat’s computers or through Google Teams. These digital platforms become lifelines for families separated by distance, preserving bonds that might otherwise weaken over time.


As noted in a recent publication, “This interconnectedness has fostered global communities, enabled cultural exchange, and facilitated the rapid dissemination of information. Maintaining relationships with loved ones, regardless of distance, has become significantly easier.”


Social media has numerous positives and negatives, but has it truly destroyed genuine human interaction? I believe this largely depends on the individual and their usage patterns. Dating apps, while not traditional social media, certainly fall into this category.

Our communication has evolved – we use abbreviations, often ignore grammar rules,
and forgo punctuation. In a study by Appel et al. (2019), it was found that heavy social media users often
experience a reduction in real-life social interactions. This can lead to feelings of isolation and loneliness, as online communication fails to provide the same level of emotional connection as our face-to-face interactions.


The online slang we encounter definitely influences how people speak today, and we frequently quote memes in conversation. Perhaps this is generational, but I wouldn’t say social media has destroyed genuine human interaction. It may have somewhat diminished it, but “destroying” seems too strong a word. My online communication with friends is typically more brief than in-person interactions.
I love genuine conversations and find listening to someone speak for hours far more engaging than texting. FaceTime offers a compromise, allowing us to hear voices and see facial expressions, but it’s also too easy to just end the call when conversations become uncomfortable.


Misinterpretations are common over text. Someone might type “k” instead of “okay,” leaving you thinking they’re upset. Messages lose their intended meaning without vocal tone or facial expressions. Perhaps the biggest issue with phones and social media is the reliance on emojis and the lack of genuine emotion behind our words.


While some people communicate exactly as they text, I don’t consider myself one of them. My texts are usually brief unless I’m using voice-to-text, which allows me to ramble at length, often incoherently.


In conclusion, social media is a double-edged sword, it connects us across vast distances while sometimes diminishing the quality of our interactions. The key lies in mindful usage, recognizing when to put down the phone and engage in person. Perhaps instead of asking if social media is destroying human interaction, we should consider how we can harness its connective power while preserving the irreplaceable value of face-to-face communication. Technology itself isn’t the problem, it’s how we choose to integrate it into our lives that matters.

+ posts

Leave a Reply

Previous post What’s up with the campus water?
Next post A Minecraft movie review

Discover more from The Eagle Eye

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading