ChatGPT, an AI-generated chatbot developed by OpenAI, is creating a stir within the field of education since its release in November. School districts and universities across the world are banning the use of the chatbot, fearing widespread plagiarism and misinformation.

New York City’s Department of Education barred the use of ChatGPT from the district’s network and devices in February while RV University in Bangalore, India placed similar restrictions.

“ChatGPT is not a sentient being. It scrapes the web for info and then regurgitates it in, generally, well-written ways, but it can’t think” said Dr. Holle Canatella, a history professor at LHU. “It can certainly have a negative impact by facilitating academic dishonesty.”

While the chatbot can write in a humanistic style, the substance of its writings are not well thought out. The chatbot looks online for information to use, but does not think like a human by taking a personable stance on the given subject.

“[I]f a student uses it to write something for one of my classes, and I don’t catch that they’ve used AI, they won’t do very well on the assignment anyway,” said Canatella.

However, not all professors think this technology is the end of the world. LHU English professor Dr. David Russell thinks differently about ChatGPT and similar technology. “I tend to take the optimistic view that we can harness this technology to actually help people become better writers.”

Whether using such technology is considered plagiarism is up for debate. Russell believes it depends on how the student uses ChatGPT. If a majority of the content is original work created by the student and the AI is only used as a framework to build upon, then a case could be made that the content is original. However, Canatella says “it is still lying to present something you did not write as your own, and this violates the university’ academic honesty policy.”

Despite the concerns, professors have tools at their disposal to catch any cheating, plagiarism and AI-generated content. Russell said “keep in mind that we already have technology designed to suss out plagiarism in Turnitin.”

Commonwealth University has not released a comment regarding a ban or restriction on ChatGPT at Mansfield, Bloomsburg, or Lock Haven campuses.AI chatbots like ChatGPT may seem concerning to some, but it is only another hurdle the higher education system can overcome. “New technology can be unnerving,” said Canatella. “We have to and will adapt to its existence.”

Alex Ross
News Editor | amr1884@lockhaven.edu |  + posts

Alex Rossis a third-year Communication student at Lock Haven with a focus in Journalism. This is his second year as an active member of the Eagle Eye and has been the Arts and Entertainment editor, News editor, and an active writer. He focuses on writing reviews for the A&E section, but has written stories for news, sports, and opinions. Outside of the newsroom, Alex enjoys record shopping, reading classic literature, and analyzing films. Alex hopes to work for a film or music news site as a writer or editor after graduation.

Leave a Reply

Previous post Playlist: Tune out the world
Next post New LHU Associate Dean emphasizes degree importance

Discover more from The Eagle Eye

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading